Evidence-backed revenue operations

Turn account data into decisions your team can defend

Runner gives selective revenue teams one project-scoped path from a reviewed import to cited qualification decisions and human-owned next actions.

Current proof: reviewed import → evidence review → qualification → owned next action.

Operable workflow

From reviewed import to an owned next action

Four human-reviewed stages turn bounded account data into a decision. Each stage preserves the evidence and operating context needed to inspect what happened.

  1. 1

    Review the import

    Preview a bounded account import, inspect accepted, duplicate, and rejected rows, then approve the exact write. Importing grants no consent and triggers no external action.

  2. 2

    Inspect the evidence

    Review source, timestamp, confidence, freshness, and conflicts before a claim affects the account. Unknown information stays visibly unknown.

  3. 3

    Record the decision

    Qualify, hold, disqualify, or request more evidence with the supporting records attached. The decision and its history remain auditable.

  4. 4

    Own the next action

    Assign a bounded next action with an owner, due date, and success measure. A person decides what happens next; the first-proof workflow sends nothing.

Capability boundary

Know what is operable now—and what must earn its way in

Enterprise trust starts with an explicit boundary. The current proof is a complete decision loop; automation remains governed expansion until its controls and evidence are ready.

Operable first proof

A complete decision loop

The current proof is intentionally narrow enough to review end to end and strong enough to produce a useful operator decision.

  • Project-scoped account import with dry-run review
  • Evidence provenance, freshness, and conflicts
  • Evidence-backed qualification history
  • Human-owned next actions with success measures
Governed expansion

Automation earns its way in

Connected providers, campaigns, and disclosed voice workflows remain expansion direction until the manual proof and their own safety gates pass.

  • Provider connections behind typed boundaries
  • Consent, suppression, and approval before outreach
  • Disclosed, reviewable voice workflows
  • Outcome evidence before broader automation
Trust and control

The decision remains reviewable from source to next action

The live proof keeps scope, evidence, consent, and operator ownership visible instead of asking teams to trust an opaque automation layer.

Human-owned decisions
Qualification and the next action remain explicit operator decisions. The first-proof workflow does not turn imported data into autonomous outreach.
Evidence stays attached
Sources, timestamps, confidence, reviews, and conflicts remain available beside the claims and decisions they support.
Consent is never inferred
A record existing, being imported, or having an order is not marketing permission. Unknown consent remains unknown and unsendable.
Project isolation is structural
Organization and project scope is resolved server-side, with row-level security and audited database functions protecting consequential writes.
Access

We work with a small number of organizations we believe in

Runner is not a self-serve volume funnel. Each engagement starts with a real workflow, a bounded proof, and direct attention from the team building the product. We expand capability only when the evidence and operating controls support it.

Request access

Tell us who you are, how your team qualifies accounts today, and where evidence or ownership breaks down. We read every application and reply either way.

team@shmaplex.com